There is a part of the culture here that places a great emphasis on the "sanctity of life". However, sanctity of life doesn't necessarily imply that there is a 'nurturing' of life. There appears to be a struggle for survival here. You know that saying, "If it doesn't kill you, it'll just make you stronger." That gets played out on several different levels around me. Our western mindset seems to have less of an emphasis on the sanctity of life and more of an emphasis on the reduction of suffering. It seems that when there is a struggle to survive; nurturing seems to be put aside. I don't think it is intentional neglect...in fact, I believe that if given the resources, nurturing would happen. I think that here, it [nurturing] is perhaps more of a luxury that can't be afforded. It is almost like there is a greater emphasis on the existence and preservation of life than on the quality of life. Honestly, I've never had to struggle to survive...so therefore it is the 'extras' of life that I focus on and work toward. It would make sense that I'd desire to reduce struggling and suffering. However, that perspective is filtered through MY worldview and birth culture. There is a degree of hopelessness that I've observed combined with (or because of) a lack of resources (not just money) that makes it essential to place an greater emphasis on survival, as opposed to improving quality of life (nurturing life). This is not to say that the culture, as a whole, is hopeless and could care less about 'tender, loving, care'. However, there is a gap between survival and nurturence. From my perspective, I see this on the human level.
However, I think that it is a little more obvious (or easier to make example of) on the animal level. Let me give you an example. There are many street dogs in this city. They look thin and malnourished...but they do look both ways before they cross the street and they do manage to survive. The strong survive...survival of the fittest, so-to-speak. It seems that the culture says that it would be incomprehensible to euthanize a suffering dog (or any animal) because regardless of the level of suffering, if there is 'life'...then let it be. Putting an end to life is unthinkable..that is up to God. Let me tell you a little story that might help illustrate my jumble of thoughts. A couple of weeks ago, I was driving home along the main road that leads out of the 'barrio' where our kids go to school. I was behind a big dumptruck. Suddenly, the big truck slowed down and came to a stop. As I was slowing down to honk my horn and pass the truck (because that is what you do), I noticed a little fledging bird in the road. Try not to judge me...but I thought, 'Aw, poor little bird, it is going to get hit...but at least then it will be out of its misery.' Then I saw a big, burly guy get out of the dump truck, run to the baby bird, gently scoop it up and head back to the truck. Sanctity of Life...regardless of suffering or potential suffering...preserve life. Let me go a step further and say, that while in this example, there appears to be a tender, loving, care element...and perhaps there is...yet, the care that is required of caring for a fledging may be too intensive to maintain. Suffering may result. Regardless, it was a very thought-provoking thing to witness.
Glimpses of "LIFE"
|We found a cocoon, detached it from its hiding place, glued it to a stick and waited. This is the butterfly that emerged!|
|A Morpho Butterly that landed on Andrew's hand!|
|These bright crabs seem to live in the grasses near the coast at the beach that we enjoying visiting. So, I guess you could call it 'crab grass'. (sorry, couldn't help it.)|
|This momma and baby belong to some friends of ours. The baby is only about 10 days old when we took this photo.|